<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 756 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for further consideration. The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit relevant documents to verify the claim of not availing Cenvat credit for services used in trading activities, emphasizing the need for a fresh order after providing a personal hearing to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 756 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for further consideration. The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit relevant documents to verify the claim of not availing Cenvat credit for services used in trading activities, emphasizing the need for a fresh order after providing a personal hearing to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>