<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357047</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed against an Order-in-Original disallowing Cenvat credit of Rs. 9,25,387 due to alleged suppression of facts by the appellant&#039;s unit. The court found no intent to evade duty, emphasizing revenue neutrality in a stock transfer within the same company. The Settlement Commission&#039;s lenient penalty imposition of Rs. 1.5 lakhs indicated no malicious intent, leading to the appeal being allowed based on the lack of grounds to deny Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357047</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed against an Order-in-Original disallowing Cenvat credit of Rs. 9,25,387 due to alleged suppression of facts by the appellant&#039;s unit. The court found no intent to evade duty, emphasizing revenue neutrality in a stock transfer within the same company. The Settlement Commission&#039;s lenient penalty imposition of Rs. 1.5 lakhs indicated no malicious intent, leading to the appeal being allowed based on the lack of grounds to deny Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>