<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1422 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200009</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Notifications remained valid until specifically rescinded, and dealers were entitled to benefits until the Notification was in force. The Tribunal&#039;s orders were modified accordingly, and the Tax Appeals and writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1422 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200009</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Notifications remained valid until specifically rescinded, and dealers were entitled to benefits until the Notification was in force. The Tribunal&#039;s orders were modified accordingly, and the Tax Appeals and writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>