https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200006 The court partially favored the petitioners by annulling the impugned communications and instructing them to pay the service tax as demanded by the 3rd respondent. The petitioners were directed to submit the invoice to the 2nd respondent for reimbursement in compliance with Policy Circular No.240-04/2016, with reimbursement consideration to be completed within three weeks of application submission, without incurring additional costs. The case concluded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:37:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200006 The court partially favored the petitioners by annulling the impugned communications and instructing them to pay the service tax as demanded by the 3rd respondent. The petitioners were directed to submit the invoice to the 2nd respondent for reimbursement in compliance with Policy Circular No.240-04/2016, with reimbursement consideration to be completed within three weeks of application submission, without incurring additional costs. The case concluded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200006