https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200003 The court determined that the Family Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction over a suit, thereby confirming that the High Court's jurisdiction was not ousted by the Family Courts Act. The suit involving joint family property was deemed to remain within the High Court's purview. The court highlighted concerns regarding the applicability of the Indian Evidence Act in Family Court proceedings but did not extensively address this issue. Additionally, the scope of the Family Courts Act in relation to guardianship, custody, or access to minors under various statutes was discussed, raising questions about the intended jurisdiction of Family Courts in such matters. The suit was directed to proceed before the High Court for adjudication. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:23:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200003 The court determined that the Family Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction over a suit, thereby confirming that the High Court's jurisdiction was not ousted by the Family Courts Act. The suit involving joint family property was deemed to remain within the High Court's purview. The court highlighted concerns regarding the applicability of the Indian Evidence Act in Family Court proceedings but did not extensively address this issue. Additionally, the scope of the Family Courts Act in relation to guardianship, custody, or access to minors under various statutes was discussed, raising questions about the intended jurisdiction of Family Courts in such matters. The suit was directed to proceed before the High Court for adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200003