<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1938 (8) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200002</link>
    <description>Some heirs of a deceased Mahomedan cannot, without representing the entire estate, maintain a suit for recovery of a single indivisible debt, because unity of title and interest requires the debt to be enforced on behalf of all heirs. A final decree for recovery of such a debt cannot be passed unless the statutory certificate of representation under the succession law is produced before decree; however, omission to file it with the plaint does not by itself defeat the suit, since the defect may be cured before final decree. The appellate court therefore set aside the decree and remanded the matter to permit production of the certificate within time, failing which the suit would stand dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1938 (8) TMI 19 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200002</link>
      <description>Some heirs of a deceased Mahomedan cannot, without representing the entire estate, maintain a suit for recovery of a single indivisible debt, because unity of title and interest requires the debt to be enforced on behalf of all heirs. A final decree for recovery of such a debt cannot be passed unless the statutory certificate of representation under the succession law is produced before decree; however, omission to file it with the plaint does not by itself defeat the suit, since the defect may be cured before final decree. The appellate court therefore set aside the decree and remanded the matter to permit production of the certificate within time, failing which the suit would stand dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>