<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 20 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12293</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Income-tax Officer was justified in passing the rectification order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The Court concluded that the mistake in applying the correct rate of tax to the total income of each beneficiary was apparent and could be rectified. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the issue was not debatable and fell within the scope of rectifiable mistakes under section 154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 20 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12293</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Income-tax Officer was justified in passing the rectification order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The Court concluded that the mistake in applying the correct rate of tax to the total income of each beneficiary was apparent and could be rectified. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the issue was not debatable and fell within the scope of rectifiable mistakes under section 154.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>