<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1103 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199996</link>
    <description>The penalty of Rs. 7,28,621/- levied by the AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim, although incorrect, was made in good faith and was withdrawn during assessment proceedings, therefore not warranting the penalty. The Tribunal also clarified that even a well-reasoned order by the CIT(A) can be reversed if found to be legally incorrect or based on a wrong appreciation of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1103 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199996</link>
      <description>The penalty of Rs. 7,28,621/- levied by the AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim, although incorrect, was made in good faith and was withdrawn during assessment proceedings, therefore not warranting the penalty. The Tribunal also clarified that even a well-reasoned order by the CIT(A) can be reversed if found to be legally incorrect or based on a wrong appreciation of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>