https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199995 The Full Bench clarified that a defendant-respondent can challenge a finding without filing cross-objections under Order 41, Rule 22 if the decree partially favors them. This right allows respondents to support the decree in their favor by contesting adverse findings from the trial court. The judgment emphasized the distinction between challenging a finding and attacking a decree, ensuring that respondents can defend their entitlement within the existing decree without seeking further advantages. The interpretation aims to prevent injustice and maintain the balance of decreed outcomes in cases of partial decrees. en-us Mon, 16 Aug 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:32:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199995 The Full Bench clarified that a defendant-respondent can challenge a finding without filing cross-objections under Order 41, Rule 22 if the decree partially favors them. This right allows respondents to support the decree in their favor by contesting adverse findings from the trial court. The judgment emphasized the distinction between challenging a finding and attacking a decree, ensuring that respondents can defend their entitlement within the existing decree without seeking further advantages. The interpretation aims to prevent injustice and maintain the balance of decreed outcomes in cases of partial decrees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Aug 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199995