https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199993 The court upheld the conviction of the accused-appellant under Section 25(1) of the Arms Act, 1959, extended to Sikkim. It found the extension valid under Article 371F (n) of the Constitution of India, resulting in the implied repeal of the Sikkim Arms Rules, 1962. The appeal challenging the conviction was dismissed, emphasizing that the plea of guilty did not admit an offense if the law was not in force. The court affirmed the legality of extending Central laws to Sikkim, concluding that the accused's conviction was valid and dismissing the appeal. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:59:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199993 The court upheld the conviction of the accused-appellant under Section 25(1) of the Arms Act, 1959, extended to Sikkim. It found the extension valid under Article 371F (n) of the Constitution of India, resulting in the implied repeal of the Sikkim Arms Rules, 1962. The appeal challenging the conviction was dismissed, emphasizing that the plea of guilty did not admit an offense if the law was not in force. The court affirmed the legality of extending Central laws to Sikkim, concluding that the accused's conviction was valid and dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199993