https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199991 A land tribunal's order vitiated by breach of natural justice need not be remanded if the claimant discloses no legally sustainable case for fresh adjudication. The Court held that remand would serve no purpose where, on the appellant's own clarification, no contractual tenancy, post-1958 grant, or other cognizable tenancy under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act was pleaded. A claim based only on long possession or prescription was outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The appellant therefore failed to establish tenant or deemed tenant status, and occupancy registration could not be granted under the statutory agrarian scheme. en-us Mon, 04 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:18:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199991 A land tribunal's order vitiated by breach of natural justice need not be remanded if the claimant discloses no legally sustainable case for fresh adjudication. The Court held that remand would serve no purpose where, on the appellant's own clarification, no contractual tenancy, post-1958 grant, or other cognizable tenancy under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act was pleaded. A claim based only on long possession or prescription was outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The appellant therefore failed to establish tenant or deemed tenant status, and occupancy registration could not be granted under the statutory agrarian scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199991