<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 64 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12291</link>
    <description>Rejection of books under s. 145(2) was upheld where the assessee did not maintain a stock register and unaccounted sales were detected in a search; the HC held that while absence of a stock register alone may not justify rejection, its absence coupled with corroborative factors such as detected undisclosed sales constituted sufficient material for the AO&#039;s satisfaction that the accounts were not correct and complete, and therefore the Tribunal&#039;s view disclosed no legal infirmity. Estimation of sales and enhancement of gross profit were sustained as a best judgment assessment grounded in past years&#039; results and not arbitrary. No substantial question of law arose; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 64 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12291</link>
      <description>Rejection of books under s. 145(2) was upheld where the assessee did not maintain a stock register and unaccounted sales were detected in a search; the HC held that while absence of a stock register alone may not justify rejection, its absence coupled with corroborative factors such as detected undisclosed sales constituted sufficient material for the AO&#039;s satisfaction that the accounts were not correct and complete, and therefore the Tribunal&#039;s view disclosed no legal infirmity. Estimation of sales and enhancement of gross profit were sustained as a best judgment assessment grounded in past years&#039; results and not arbitrary. No substantial question of law arose; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>