https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the actions of governmental agencies arbitrary and unjust. It held that the refusal to grant permission for remittance of retiral benefits was based on collusion and conspiracy, leading to harassive conduct. The court also upheld the validity of notices under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, noting that the petitioner had waived any irregularities in service by acting upon the notices. The rule was made absolute, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the actions of governmental agencies arbitrary and unjust. It held that the refusal to grant permission for remittance of retiral benefits was based on collusion and conspiracy, leading to harassive conduct. The court also upheld the validity of notices under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, noting that the petitioner had waived any irregularities in service by acting upon the notices. The rule was made absolute, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988