<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 322 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988</link>
    <description>Reassessment notice under the Income-tax Act was examined on two points. On service and jurisdiction, the notice was sent to the last known address, returned unserved, and was also received through the employer; on those facts, any defect in service was treated as a curable irregularity, not a jurisdictional flaw, and the challenge on that ground failed. On fairness, the proceedings were said to rest on incorrect facts and collateral pressure after the foreign-exchange matter had ended, so the continuation of reassessment was treated as arbitrary and unjustified. The writ petition succeeded and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 322 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988</link>
      <description>Reassessment notice under the Income-tax Act was examined on two points. On service and jurisdiction, the notice was sent to the last known address, returned unserved, and was also received through the employer; on those facts, any defect in service was treated as a curable irregularity, not a jurisdictional flaw, and the challenge on that ground failed. On fairness, the proceedings were said to rest on incorrect facts and collateral pressure after the foreign-exchange matter had ended, so the continuation of reassessment was treated as arbitrary and unjustified. The writ petition succeeded and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>