<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 329 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199986</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of Writ Petitions 1767 and 1768 of 1982 through a common judgment. Writ Petition 1767 was allowed, while 1768 was dismissed. The court found no evidence of ante-dating the bill of lading. The goods were not liable to confiscation. The court upheld the judgment of the Single Judge, dismissing Writ Petition 1768, and the Writ Appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 329 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199986</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of Writ Petitions 1767 and 1768 of 1982 through a common judgment. Writ Petition 1767 was allowed, while 1768 was dismissed. The court found no evidence of ante-dating the bill of lading. The goods were not liable to confiscation. The court upheld the judgment of the Single Judge, dismissing Writ Petition 1768, and the Writ Appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>