https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199977 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Sections 5 and 6 of the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution. It validated requisition orders if the public purpose was established and clarified the burden of proof in challenging such orders. The court dismissed the appeals with no order on costs, except for one appeal dismissed based on the Attorney-General's assurance. en-us Tue, 12 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:42:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199977 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Sections 5 and 6 of the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution. It validated requisition orders if the public purpose was established and clarified the burden of proof in challenging such orders. The court dismissed the appeals with no order on costs, except for one appeal dismissed based on the Attorney-General's assurance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199977