https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975 The Court upheld the validity of the Scheme under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, for providing access to Guru Nanak Stadium. It ruled that the failure to serve notice on the property owner did not invalidate the Scheme as the Municipality had been informed. The Court emphasized public authorities' duty to inquire about property ownership before acquisition and dismissed allegations of mala fide acquisition. It upheld the Scheme's justification for public benefit, balancing it against individual property rights, and directed the Trust to provide suitable accommodation to the appellant. The appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:22:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975 The Court upheld the validity of the Scheme under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, for providing access to Guru Nanak Stadium. It ruled that the failure to serve notice on the property owner did not invalidate the Scheme as the Municipality had been informed. The Court emphasized public authorities' duty to inquire about property ownership before acquisition and dismissed allegations of mala fide acquisition. It upheld the Scheme's justification for public benefit, balancing it against individual property rights, and directed the Trust to provide suitable accommodation to the appellant. The appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975