https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975 Under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, failure to serve personal notice did not invalidate the acquisition where the Scheme had been duly published, notice had been given to the Municipality, and the authority had no duty to repeatedly search registration records for later transfers. The acquisition was not shown to be mala fide, and refusal of injunction against enforcement was upheld in the absence of any manifest error. The Scheme for direct stadium access was justified by public safety and convenience, and the appellant's private hardship was outweighed by the public purpose, though alternative residential accommodation was directed as compensation. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:22:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975 Under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, failure to serve personal notice did not invalidate the acquisition where the Scheme had been duly published, notice had been given to the Municipality, and the authority had no duty to repeatedly search registration records for later transfers. The acquisition was not shown to be mala fide, and refusal of injunction against enforcement was upheld in the absence of any manifest error. The Scheme for direct stadium access was justified by public safety and convenience, and the appellant's private hardship was outweighed by the public purpose, though alternative residential accommodation was directed as compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199975