<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 9 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12287</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the writ petition challenging it. Emphasizing the need to establish the absence of material for forming a belief of escaped income, the court ruled that the notice cannot be quashed solely based on sufficiency of reasons. The petitioner&#039;s failure to prove the lack of a basis for the notice led to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 9 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12287</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the writ petition challenging it. Emphasizing the need to establish the absence of material for forming a belief of escaped income, the court ruled that the notice cannot be quashed solely based on sufficiency of reasons. The petitioner&#039;s failure to prove the lack of a basis for the notice led to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>