https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199972 The High Court held that the place of detention, being Bombay, gives jurisdiction to the High Court at Bombay to entertain the petition challenging the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. The court emphasized that the cause of action is determined by the place of detention, not the residence of a close relative, and directed the transmission of the case to Bombay for further proceedings. The objections regarding territorial jurisdiction were upheld, emphasizing the importance of the place of detention in determining jurisdiction under Article 226. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:52:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199972 The High Court held that the place of detention, being Bombay, gives jurisdiction to the High Court at Bombay to entertain the petition challenging the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. The court emphasized that the cause of action is determined by the place of detention, not the residence of a close relative, and directed the transmission of the case to Bombay for further proceedings. The objections regarding territorial jurisdiction were upheld, emphasizing the importance of the place of detention in determining jurisdiction under Article 226. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 19 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199972