https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199971 The court held that the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation is considered a Court under the Limitation Act, 1963. Therefore, the provisions of the Limitation Act apply to proceedings before the Commissioner. Although the application for restoration of the claim case was initially considered time-barred, the court granted the workman an opportunity to explain the delay. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for further proceedings based on the workman's explanation for the delay. Failure to comply within the specified time frame would result in dismissal of the restoration application. en-us Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:26:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199971 The court held that the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation is considered a Court under the Limitation Act, 1963. Therefore, the provisions of the Limitation Act apply to proceedings before the Commissioner. Although the application for restoration of the claim case was initially considered time-barred, the court granted the workman an opportunity to explain the delay. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for further proceedings based on the workman's explanation for the delay. Failure to comply within the specified time frame would result in dismissal of the restoration application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199971