https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357029 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. The Tribunal corrected additions made by the CIT(A) and emphasized the importance of thorough verification processes to ensure accurate assessments. The Assessing Officer's decisions were found faulty in the case of unexplained amounts related to Google charges, unexplained deposits with SBT, and unexplained investments, leading to corrections and remands for further scrutiny. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357029 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. The Tribunal corrected additions made by the CIT(A) and emphasized the importance of thorough verification processes to ensure accurate assessments. The Assessing Officer's decisions were found faulty in the case of unexplained amounts related to Google charges, unexplained deposits with SBT, and unexplained investments, leading to corrections and remands for further scrutiny. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357029