<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 726 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 57,44,940 on account of undisclosed sources related to the purchase of property. The Tribunal emphasized that the entire investment amount was explained, with Rs. 83,00,000 being paid through a cheque from the son&#039;s account. The Tribunal found no justification for the addition and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 726 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 57,44,940 on account of undisclosed sources related to the purchase of property. The Tribunal emphasized that the entire investment amount was explained, with Rs. 83,00,000 being paid through a cheque from the son&#039;s account. The Tribunal found no justification for the addition and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>