<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 722 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357019</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to meet procedural requirements and deadlines for premium claims on surrendered REP licenses. Past court orders were deemed inapplicable due to delayed filing, and the RBI&#039;s role in pre-auditing payments was highlighted. The petitioner&#039;s claims were denied, and the rule was discharged without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 722 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357019</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to meet procedural requirements and deadlines for premium claims on surrendered REP licenses. Past court orders were deemed inapplicable due to delayed filing, and the RBI&#039;s role in pre-auditing payments was highlighted. The petitioner&#039;s claims were denied, and the rule was discharged without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>