https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357011 The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, ruling that the Disciplinary Authority's actions, including remitting the inquiry and appointing new officers, amounted to a de novo inquiry, contrary to Rule 15(1) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. The Court found the reasons for remittance to be either extraneous or factually incorrect, and dismissed the writ petition with costs of Rs. 10,000. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:36:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357011 The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, ruling that the Disciplinary Authority's actions, including remitting the inquiry and appointing new officers, amounted to a de novo inquiry, contrary to Rule 15(1) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. The Court found the reasons for remittance to be either extraneous or factually incorrect, and dismissed the writ petition with costs of Rs. 10,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357011