<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 708 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, upholding the denial of credit on inputs/capital goods and towers/shelters for the normal period without penalties, while allowing credit on input services and setting aside the denial of exemption under Notification No. 4/2004-ST. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was deemed unwarranted due to the appellants&#039; bonafide belief, resulting in a nuanced resolution of the contested issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:35:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 708 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, upholding the denial of credit on inputs/capital goods and towers/shelters for the normal period without penalties, while allowing credit on input services and setting aside the denial of exemption under Notification No. 4/2004-ST. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was deemed unwarranted due to the appellants&#039; bonafide belief, resulting in a nuanced resolution of the contested issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>