<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 692 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356989</link>
    <description>Structural steel and allied items used to fabricate support structures for capital goods may qualify for CENVAT credit under the user test and can be treated as components, spares, or accessories under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. However, entitlement depends on evidence of actual use. As the record did not adequately support the claimed use of the goods, factual verification was necessary, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for that limited purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 692 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356989</link>
      <description>Structural steel and allied items used to fabricate support structures for capital goods may qualify for CENVAT credit under the user test and can be treated as components, spares, or accessories under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. However, entitlement depends on evidence of actual use. As the record did not adequately support the claimed use of the goods, factual verification was necessary, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for that limited purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>