<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 689 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand against the appellant, directing the adjudicating authority to reevaluate the evidence presented in line with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The rejection of the appellant&#039;s argument due to insufficient documents was overturned, as the Tribunal found the evidence provided in the Appeal Paper Book to be satisfactory, allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 689 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand against the appellant, directing the adjudicating authority to reevaluate the evidence presented in line with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The rejection of the appellant&#039;s argument due to insufficient documents was overturned, as the Tribunal found the evidence provided in the Appeal Paper Book to be satisfactory, allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>