https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356984 The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original concerning duty demand exceeding the SSI exemption limit. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing X-Ray Machines and trading supporting items, disputed the Revenue's allegation of clandestine clearance based on balance sheet figures. Despite the Director's admission to exceeding the limit and paying the differential duty, the lack of evidence showing manufactured goods exceeding the limit led to the conclusion that the Revenue's allegation lacked justification. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside due to insufficient supporting evidence, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:35:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356984 The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original concerning duty demand exceeding the SSI exemption limit. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing X-Ray Machines and trading supporting items, disputed the Revenue's allegation of clandestine clearance based on balance sheet figures. Despite the Director's admission to exceeding the limit and paying the differential duty, the lack of evidence showing manufactured goods exceeding the limit led to the conclusion that the Revenue's allegation lacked justification. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside due to insufficient supporting evidence, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356984