https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356982 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim of abatement, setting aside the rejection by lower authorities. The appellant, a manufacturer of Pan Masala with Tobacco, filed the abatement claim due to factory closure for over 15 days. The Tribunal held that the denial of abatement solely based on the requirement to pay duty for the whole month was incorrect. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the abatement claim, emphasizing the appellant's entitlement to the relief sought. The appeal was allowed, affirming the appellant's right to claim abatement based on specific circumstances. en-us Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:34:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356982 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim of abatement, setting aside the rejection by lower authorities. The appellant, a manufacturer of Pan Masala with Tobacco, filed the abatement claim due to factory closure for over 15 days. The Tribunal held that the denial of abatement solely based on the requirement to pay duty for the whole month was incorrect. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the abatement claim, emphasizing the appellant's entitlement to the relief sought. The appeal was allowed, affirming the appellant's right to claim abatement based on specific circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356982