<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a manufacturer of boilers, in a case concerning eligibility for exemption under Notification No.67/95 for captive consumption of inputs. The Tribunal found the issue identical to a precedent case and held that the demand raised by the department was unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee and dismissed the appeal filed by the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a manufacturer of boilers, in a case concerning eligibility for exemption under Notification No.67/95 for captive consumption of inputs. The Tribunal found the issue identical to a precedent case and held that the demand raised by the department was unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee and dismissed the appeal filed by the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>