<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</link>
    <description>Captive-consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95 was held available for inputs used in manufacturing final products cleared under Notification No. 6/2006-CE. The Tribunal noted that the dispute was covered by an earlier decision on identical facts and followed that precedent. On that basis, the demand premised on denial of the exemption could not be sustained, and the associated interest and penalty also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</link>
      <description>Captive-consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95 was held available for inputs used in manufacturing final products cleared under Notification No. 6/2006-CE. The Tribunal noted that the dispute was covered by an earlier decision on identical facts and followed that precedent. On that basis, the demand premised on denial of the exemption could not be sustained, and the associated interest and penalty also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>