https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356979 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the appellant, enjoying area-based exemption in Haridwar, was found ineligible to claim Cenvat Credit on the final product manufactured at the sister unit in Malanpur. The Tribunal held that the appellant's procedural errors and the nature of the business deal precluded claiming the credit to avoid double benefits. The impugned order disallowing the Cenvat Credit was upheld, emphasizing the absence of provisions allowing for such credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356979 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the appellant, enjoying area-based exemption in Haridwar, was found ineligible to claim Cenvat Credit on the final product manufactured at the sister unit in Malanpur. The Tribunal held that the appellant's procedural errors and the nature of the business deal precluded claiming the credit to avoid double benefits. The impugned order disallowing the Cenvat Credit was upheld, emphasizing the absence of provisions allowing for such credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356979