https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199960 A writ petition challenging a conditional stay order was not entertained on merits because the petitioner had an available statutory appellate remedy before the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority. The Court held that the petitioner should first pursue that appellate course rather than seek writ intervention against the assessment-related recovery process. Given the expiring time for deposit, the Court granted limited interim protection by directing the respondents not to recover the tax amount for 15 days, enabling the petitioner to file an appeal and a stay application before the appellate authority. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199960 A writ petition challenging a conditional stay order was not entertained on merits because the petitioner had an available statutory appellate remedy before the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority. The Court held that the petitioner should first pursue that appellate course rather than seek writ intervention against the assessment-related recovery process. Given the expiring time for deposit, the Court granted limited interim protection by directing the respondents not to recover the tax amount for 15 days, enabling the petitioner to file an appeal and a stay application before the appellate authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199960