https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199964 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff's amended plea for declaration of title was time-barred and the doctrine of relation back did not apply. The plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction was dismissed for failure to establish title, and the dispute over the identity of the properties needed resolution. The plea of limitation was pivotal, with the amendment for a declaration of title considered untimely, highlighting the significance of complying with statutory limitation periods in civil cases. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199964 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff's amended plea for declaration of title was time-barred and the doctrine of relation back did not apply. The plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction was dismissed for failure to establish title, and the dispute over the identity of the properties needed resolution. The plea of limitation was pivotal, with the amendment for a declaration of title considered untimely, highlighting the significance of complying with statutory limitation periods in civil cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199964