<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1608 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199965</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in relying on criminal court findings for specific performance without independent verification. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of specific performance and concluded that evidence from criminal proceedings alone was insufficient for granting specific performance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1608 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199965</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in relying on criminal court findings for specific performance without independent verification. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of specific performance and concluded that evidence from criminal proceedings alone was insufficient for granting specific performance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>