https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199954 The High Court set aside the convictions under Sections 302 and 392 IPC due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case. However, the Court convicted the accused under Section 201 IPC and sentenced him to three years of rigorous imprisonment for his role in hiding evidence and screening the actual offenders. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:25:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199954 The High Court set aside the convictions under Sections 302 and 392 IPC due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case. However, the Court convicted the accused under Section 201 IPC and sentenced him to three years of rigorous imprisonment for his role in hiding evidence and screening the actual offenders. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199954