<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (7) TMI 24 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199952</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree in favor of the Plaintiffs, allowing them to recover the suit lands and profits. It held that the surrender by the widow was valid, the original grant included both melwaram and kudiwaram, and Section 44-B of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act did not bar the maintainability of the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (7) TMI 24 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199952</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree in favor of the Plaintiffs, allowing them to recover the suit lands and profits. It held that the surrender by the widow was valid, the original grant included both melwaram and kudiwaram, and Section 44-B of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act did not bar the maintainability of the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>