https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199950 A dismissal order signed by a person who had not been shown to be appointed by the Government as acting Municipal Commissioner was held to be without authority and therefore invalid. The Court also held that the municipal Act's special limitation and notice protection applied only to acts done or purported to be done under the Act by authorised municipal , and could not shield an order wholly without jurisdiction. Because that statutory bar had to be specifically pleaded and rested on a legally sustainable basis, the suit was not governed by the special six-month limitation and remained maintainable. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:46:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199950 A dismissal order signed by a person who had not been shown to be appointed by the Government as acting Municipal Commissioner was held to be without authority and therefore invalid. The Court also held that the municipal Act's special limitation and notice protection applied only to acts done or purported to be done under the Act by authorised municipal , and could not shield an order wholly without jurisdiction. Because that statutory bar had to be specifically pleaded and rested on a legally sustainable basis, the suit was not governed by the special six-month limitation and remained maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199950