<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 406 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199946</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition cannot be maintained on a genuinely disputed debt. The claimed interest was not admitted, the principal had already been paid, and there was no contractual stipulation for interest between the parties; the demand rested only on bills. On those facts, the alleged liability was not an undisputed or admitted debt capable of grounding winding-up jurisdiction, so the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 406 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199946</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition cannot be maintained on a genuinely disputed debt. The claimed interest was not admitted, the principal had already been paid, and there was no contractual stipulation for interest between the parties; the demand rested only on bills. On those facts, the alleged liability was not an undisputed or admitted debt capable of grounding winding-up jurisdiction, so the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>