<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 60 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12274</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the investment allowance on ultrasound medical diagnostic electrical equipment, air-conditioner, and servo voltage stabilizer under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the images produced by the ultrasound machine constituted a &quot;thing&quot; within the Act&#039;s definition, supporting the claim for investment allowance. Referring to precedents and decisions from various High Courts, the court established a consistent interpretation of the law across jurisdictions, ultimately granting the investment allowance based on judicial opinion and the need for uniformity in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 60 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12274</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the investment allowance on ultrasound medical diagnostic electrical equipment, air-conditioner, and servo voltage stabilizer under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the images produced by the ultrasound machine constituted a &quot;thing&quot; within the Act&#039;s definition, supporting the claim for investment allowance. Referring to precedents and decisions from various High Courts, the court established a consistent interpretation of the law across jurisdictions, ultimately granting the investment allowance based on judicial opinion and the need for uniformity in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>