https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944 A Section 80 CPC notice must substantially and specifically disclose the basis of the intended suit, and a material variance between the notice and the plaint is not substantial compliance. Here, the notice rested on a different contractual foundation from the later plaint, so the notice was invalid and the suit was not maintainable. The claim for refund of the advance deposit was also barred because Section 40 of the Punjab Excise Act expressly denies compensation or refund of any fee or deposit when a licence is cancelled or suspended. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Sun, 15 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:23:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944 A Section 80 CPC notice must substantially and specifically disclose the basis of the intended suit, and a material variance between the notice and the plaint is not substantial compliance. Here, the notice rested on a different contractual foundation from the later plaint, so the notice was invalid and the suit was not maintainable. The claim for refund of the advance deposit was also barred because Section 40 of the Punjab Excise Act expressly denies compensation or refund of any fee or deposit when a licence is cancelled or suspended. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 15 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944