https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944 The Court held that the appellant's claim failed due to non-compliance with Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code and the bar under Section 40 of the Punjab Excise Act. The notice under Section 80 did not adequately state the cause of action and relief claimed, and there was a significant variance between the notice and the plaint. The Court emphasized that the original notice's validity was not extinguished by the withdrawal of the initial suit. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Sun, 15 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:23:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944 The Court held that the appellant's claim failed due to non-compliance with Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code and the bar under Section 40 of the Punjab Excise Act. The notice under Section 80 did not adequately state the cause of action and relief claimed, and there was a significant variance between the notice and the plaint. The Court emphasized that the original notice's validity was not extinguished by the withdrawal of the initial suit. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 15 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199944