https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199943 For leave to appeal under Article 133, entitlement depends on the real value of the subject-matter, not merely the valuation stated in the plaint or memorandum of appeal. A party is not automatically bound by an earlier valuation used for court-fee or appeal purposes, because a mistaken valuation does not by itself settle the question of value. Departure from that valuation is barred only where a prior judicial adjudication attracts res judicata, or where the party made a true election between valuations and secured an advantage or caused detriment to the opposite side. In the absence of such circumstances, the real value may be proved. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:16:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199943 For leave to appeal under Article 133, entitlement depends on the real value of the subject-matter, not merely the valuation stated in the plaint or memorandum of appeal. A party is not automatically bound by an earlier valuation used for court-fee or appeal purposes, because a mistaken valuation does not by itself settle the question of value. Departure from that valuation is barred only where a prior judicial adjudication attracts res judicata, or where the party made a true election between valuations and secured an advantage or caused detriment to the opposite side. In the absence of such circumstances, the real value may be proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199943