https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939 The retrenchment of the worker was deemed proper and justified by the Supreme Court. The Court found that despite a defect in the retrenchment notice, the closure of the specific project fell under Section 25FFF(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, exempting the employer from providing compensation under Section 25F(b). The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the previous award, and made no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:47:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939 The retrenchment of the worker was deemed proper and justified by the Supreme Court. The Court found that despite a defect in the retrenchment notice, the closure of the specific project fell under Section 25FFF(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, exempting the employer from providing compensation under Section 25F(b). The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the previous award, and made no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939