https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939 A distinct construction undertaking closed on completion of the work falls within Section 25FFF(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, so compensation under Section 25F(b) is excluded; the retrenchment was therefore not open to challenge on that footing. A separate objection that the retrenchment notice was conditional could not be entertained on general pleadings, because such a challenge required specific pleading to give the employer fair notice of the case to meet. The SC held that the tribunal erred in allowing that objection and treated the retrenchment as proper and justified. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:47:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939 A distinct construction undertaking closed on completion of the work falls within Section 25FFF(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, so compensation under Section 25F(b) is excluded; the retrenchment was therefore not open to challenge on that footing. A separate objection that the retrenchment notice was conditional could not be entertained on general pleadings, because such a challenge required specific pleading to give the employer fair notice of the case to meet. The SC held that the tribunal erred in allowing that objection and treated the retrenchment as proper and justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199939