https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12272 Concurrent factual findings on the genuineness of donations and the assessee-trust's entitlement to exemption under section 11 were upheld because the donors' details, including addresses, cheque particulars and PANs, had been furnished to the Assessing Officer. No perversity or independent legal issue was shown in those findings, so no substantial question of law arose under section 260A. The appeal failed. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12272 Concurrent factual findings on the genuineness of donations and the assessee-trust's entitlement to exemption under section 11 were upheld because the donors' details, including addresses, cheque particulars and PANs, had been furnished to the Assessing Officer. No perversity or independent legal issue was shown in those findings, so no substantial question of law arose under section 260A. The appeal failed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12272