<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12271</link>
    <description>Rental income derived from the letting of owned warehouses was held to fall under the head of income from house property because the source of receipt was ownership and letting of the property. The assessee&#039;s object of commercially exploiting the warehouses did not change the character of the income, as the heads of income are mutually exclusive and property income cannot be reclassified as business income merely on that basis. Temporary or continuing occupation by a lessee also did not alter the tax character of the receipt. The issue was therefore answered in favour of the Revenue, and the income was taxable as house property income, not business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12271</link>
      <description>Rental income derived from the letting of owned warehouses was held to fall under the head of income from house property because the source of receipt was ownership and letting of the property. The assessee&#039;s object of commercially exploiting the warehouses did not change the character of the income, as the heads of income are mutually exclusive and property income cannot be reclassified as business income merely on that basis. Temporary or continuing occupation by a lessee also did not alter the tax character of the receipt. The issue was therefore answered in favour of the Revenue, and the income was taxable as house property income, not business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>