<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1755 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199927</link>
    <description>The court invalidated all votes polled in the District Court campus at Nagercoil and Padmanabhapuram due to severe election malpractices, including tampering and irregularities. The Tamil Nadu Advocates Association&#039;s suit was deemed maintainable, emphasizing the right of professional societies to represent their members. The judgment highlighted violations of election rules, extensive malpractices, and the lack of provisions for re-polling, leading to the decision to invalidate the votes rather than order a re-poll. The court&#039;s focus on upholding fair election processes and addressing malpractices was central to its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1755 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199927</link>
      <description>The court invalidated all votes polled in the District Court campus at Nagercoil and Padmanabhapuram due to severe election malpractices, including tampering and irregularities. The Tamil Nadu Advocates Association&#039;s suit was deemed maintainable, emphasizing the right of professional societies to represent their members. The judgment highlighted violations of election rules, extensive malpractices, and the lack of provisions for re-polling, leading to the decision to invalidate the votes rather than order a re-poll. The court&#039;s focus on upholding fair election processes and addressing malpractices was central to its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>