https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199924 The suit was deemed not maintainable as it lacked the necessary court permission for a representative suit. The Bishop's appointment was confirmed to be for a 10-year term as accepted by the Bishop, with the Synod having the final decision-making authority. The Court allowed the first respondent to serve as caretaker Bishop until a new appointment by the competent authority, setting aside the previous order. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:05:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199924 The suit was deemed not maintainable as it lacked the necessary court permission for a representative suit. The Bishop's appointment was confirmed to be for a 10-year term as accepted by the Bishop, with the Synod having the final decision-making authority. The Court allowed the first respondent to serve as caretaker Bishop until a new appointment by the competent authority, setting aside the previous order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199924