<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 66 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12270</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the fair market value of a property for capital gains calculation. The court found the use of the Sub-Registrar&#039;s certificate and municipal tax assessment as valid indicators for valuation, emphasizing the importance of considering various factors in determining fair market value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the High Court noted the absence of conflicting evidence to refute the valuation methods used. The judgment highlighted the necessity of a comprehensive assessment when direct sales data for comparison is unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 66 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12270</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the fair market value of a property for capital gains calculation. The court found the use of the Sub-Registrar&#039;s certificate and municipal tax assessment as valid indicators for valuation, emphasizing the importance of considering various factors in determining fair market value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the High Court noted the absence of conflicting evidence to refute the valuation methods used. The judgment highlighted the necessity of a comprehensive assessment when direct sales data for comparison is unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>