<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the award made by private arbitrators affecting partition of immovable property is compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. Non-registration of the award renders it inadmissible as evidence of title under Section 49. The award created a right, title, and interest in half share of the house for the appellant, but its non-registration negated the claim as the owner of the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the award made by private arbitrators affecting partition of immovable property is compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. Non-registration of the award renders it inadmissible as evidence of title under Section 49. The award created a right, title, and interest in half share of the house for the appellant, but its non-registration negated the claim as the owner of the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>