https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199919 The appellate court held that the auction-purchaser did not automatically acquire title to the growing crops on the land sold in execution of a money realization decree. The judgment-debtor was entitled to restitution for the crops, and the case was remanded to determine the crop value. The court set aside previous judgments, ruling the purchaser was not entitled to the crops. The judgment-debtor was awarded costs, and counsel fees were set at Rs. 300 for all courts. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:55:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199919 The appellate court held that the auction-purchaser did not automatically acquire title to the growing crops on the land sold in execution of a money realization decree. The judgment-debtor was entitled to restitution for the crops, and the case was remanded to determine the crop value. The court set aside previous judgments, ruling the purchaser was not entitled to the crops. The judgment-debtor was awarded costs, and counsel fees were set at Rs. 300 for all courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199919