https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199917 Unregistered or expired agreements conferring forest produce rights could not be enforced under Article 32 because an unregistered document could not establish the claimed entitlement and, at most, gave rise to a contractual remedy. The Court also held that the registered agreements were not mere licences or contracts of sale of goods: they conferred broader interests over forest produce and ancillary rights of occupation and land use, including timber, bamboo, brick-earth, pruning, coppicing, burning and erection of structures. Those interests were proprietary rights and, on abolition of proprietary rights, vested in the State under Sections 3 and 4 of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950. The petitions therefore failed. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:48:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199917 Unregistered or expired agreements conferring forest produce rights could not be enforced under Article 32 because an unregistered document could not establish the claimed entitlement and, at most, gave rise to a contractual remedy. The Court also held that the registered agreements were not mere licences or contracts of sale of goods: they conferred broader interests over forest produce and ancillary rights of occupation and land use, including timber, bamboo, brick-earth, pruning, coppicing, burning and erection of structures. Those interests were proprietary rights and, on abolition of proprietary rights, vested in the State under Sections 3 and 4 of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950. The petitions therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199917