<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (7) TMI 19 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199914</link>
    <description>The Division Bench held that an acknowledgment of liability only extends the limitation period and does not create a new right or basis for a suit. The Full Bench decision of the former Chief Court of Jodhpur regarding acknowledgment of liability was deemed not binding on the High Court of Rajasthan. The judgment clarified the jurisdictional differences between the former Chief Court of Jodhpur and the High Court of Rajasthan, emphasizing that Judge-made law was not included in the definition of &#039;law&#039; in relevant ordinances. The plaintiff was permitted to amend the plaint to include the original cause of action, and the case was remanded to the trial Court for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (7) TMI 19 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199914</link>
      <description>The Division Bench held that an acknowledgment of liability only extends the limitation period and does not create a new right or basis for a suit. The Full Bench decision of the former Chief Court of Jodhpur regarding acknowledgment of liability was deemed not binding on the High Court of Rajasthan. The judgment clarified the jurisdictional differences between the former Chief Court of Jodhpur and the High Court of Rajasthan, emphasizing that Judge-made law was not included in the definition of &#039;law&#039; in relevant ordinances. The plaintiff was permitted to amend the plaint to include the original cause of action, and the case was remanded to the trial Court for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>